COVID 19 Vaccine

 

Covid-19 Vaccines... are you for or against them ???

     Did you take one or more Covid-19 vaccines (including "Boosters") ?  If so, are you still confident in choice to take them?  If not, why not.  If you chose to not take the vaccine, are you now more or less confident in your decision ?  If you took one or more of the vaccines, did you later get Covid, or have you stayed Covid free after the shot(s) ?  If you did not take the shot(s), did you stay Covid free during the Covid period?  And lastly... are you among the many that are "vaccine injured" ?  Please share your thoughts below.

     I personally am (Covid) vaccine-free.  I took no Covid vaccines.  I caught the "seasonal influenza" (i.e. the Flu) back in February 2020.  This was before Covid-19 was a household name.  I was not tested (don't even think there was a "Covid-19" test back then) when I encountered the symptoms of the Flu.  I just assumed it was the Flu, as I suspect most did back then.  (Note:  I have not had any flu like symptoms since then)  The first reported case of Covid-19 was reported in Washington state on January 21, 2020.  I personally think the whole "Covid" thing was a scam, perpetrated by the government(s) and the pharmaceutical companies.  The governments gained power the likes they never had before, and the pharmaceutical companies made trillions of dollars.  The true holy grail of the elite... power and money.

 

     Depending on which sources you read, the Flu disappeared as Covid cases rose.  Some believe the death of the Flu was due to the political pressures to promote the fear of Covid, while others conclude the Flu disappeared because of the Covid measures put in place, like mask wearing and social distancing, etc.  If the latter is true then why did Covid rage? 

SteveKirsch 2

     Regardless of which camp you may be in, there is no scientific data that would suggest anything different than Covid testing (PCR) was designed to pick up any degree or strain of viral respiratory infection.  In other words, if you had the Flu, a Covid test would most likely return a positive reading (for Covid, i.e. if you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail).  The seasonal Flu and Covid are such close cousins that testing could not distinguish between the two.  

     Then there is the controversy over the Cycle Threshold (Ct) used in the test.  During a PCR test for SARS-CoV-2  (the virus that causes Covid-19), viral genetic material on the swab sample is purified, stabilized and concentrated.  If the genetic material of interest is present in the sample, it is then copied again and again by heating and cooling the material in the presence of various substances. Each iteration of this is called a thermal cycle.   As genetic material is amplified (with real time PCR) fluorescence is produced; how this happens exactly varies by PCR method, but basically involves those substances added to the test releasing fluorescent particles or becoming more fluorescent.  Eventually the fluorescence is strong enough to be detected. The number of thermal cycles required to reach this point is known as the cycle threshold.  The fewer cycles required before that fluorescence is observed, the greater the concentration of viral genetic material in the original sample, roughly speaking. Conversely, the more cycles that are required, the smaller the concentration of viral material on the original sample.   And, while the maximum number of thermal cycles a coronavirus PCR test will do is typically around 35-40, many positive samples will be detectable at much lower levels.   The inventor of the PCR test said this... Dr Mullis said that "this PCR test was not made to detect any type of infectious disease. It’s designed to pick up a signature of DNA and RNA of the person being tested.”  So, ask yourself this... if the test was flawed (inaccurate)... are ANY of the case numbers accurate ??? 

Are the Vaccines "Safe and Effective" ???

     We can discuss "safe" below, but how about "Effective"?  Roughly about 75% of the WORLD population has taken at least one shot.  That leaves roughly about 25% that didn't.  What better way to test effectiveness than to study the vaccinated against the UN-vaccinated.  Surely they have done that by now, right?  NO, they haven't.  I wonder why?  Could it be that they already know what the results of that study would be?  If they don't test, or study something, then they can use the phrase... "we have "seen no data" that suggests the vaccine is not effective".  Pretty clever right? You will hear this phrase used quite often in response to a whole host of issues.  This is a head-in-the-sand tactic used often when the data would not support their narrative.  If I don't look, nothing is there, right ???  WRONG !  When you hear that phrase ("seen-no-data")... that's a big red flag for deception.  

     What we do know at this time is that the vaccines don't prevent someone from getting Covid.  We also know that getting the vaccine does not keep someone from transmitting Covid.  So, in spite of all the initial hype of the vaccines being "Safe and Effective"... that was wishful thinking at best, or, an outright lie.  There are documents available now from the pharmaceutical companies own internal tests that they never tested for effectiveness.  See: https://expose-news.com/2022/09/19/pfizer-accidentially-proves-covid-vaccine-destroys-immune-system/?cmid=c2ba43a3-50de-43b8-9f4d-4b77ac2e6066

     Also keep in mind that data is hard to come by, and, when it's not favorable to the established narrative of "safe and effective"... is was either hid altogether or buried in the search engine results, and then "fact-checked" by supporters of the narrative, which received preferential listings in the search results.  Then, if it did leak out, the establishment or person drawing attention to the data was ridiculed and cancelled. 

     WHY was this "safe and effective" narrative so prolific... MONEY.   The pharmaceutical companies were set to make trillions off the increased fear of Covid, and the sales of vaccines.  The pharmaceutical companies made HUGE sponsorships purchases to the main street news media, and they in turn heavily supported the narrative simply because the pharmaceutical companies kept the lights on in the studios.  

 

 Are the Covid Vaccines Safe ?

 SteveKirsch 3

 [Excerpt from: https://dailysceptic.org/2022/08/06/vaccine-deaths-outnumber-covid-deaths-in-u-s-households-two-new-polls-confirm/ ]

 

 SteveKirsch 4

     There are numerous more examples of the documented concerns and signals of the vaccines NOT being safe (but most are several pages down on search engine results).  If you are one of the ones who does not believe any of the available data, and also the testimonials of the practicing medical doctors that have come forward indicating these vaccines are anything BUT safe... is there ANYTHING that would convince you ?  Would you only believe what the government agencies like the CDC, WHO, etc tell you?  These are the very same agencies that have been caught in lie after lie, both by distorting the data, by omissions, and by changing the historical meaning of words. 

 ScamAlert

 Folks... wake up... the pharmaceutical companies and elites are lying to you for monetary and power gain.  Its all about the money and power, and the use of public FEAR to achieve such.  There is plenty of evidence to support this theory and opinion if you take the time to look for it.  There are those that have put their life, and livelihood on the line to provide this information to you.  Look at the number of doctors that have had their medical license threatened or revoked.  Look at all the reporters that have been removed from social media because they wanted to bring you the result of their research.  At some point folks should realize that there must be a reason why they want to censor this data from you.  When someone prevents you from hearing or seeing something... that a big red flag.   Most folks want to see both sides and be allowed to make up their own minds, but when they prevent you from doing this, they must be hiding something.  The truth maybe ?  Remember... if the warnings against "safe and effective" were false, there would be no need to hide the information from you, they could disprove this with opossing facts.  Those in favor of censorship usually are hiding the truth !

SteveKirsch 5

UPDATE: 4/2/2024

GatewayPundit 3

 

Here is the link to the full article, but if it disappears, HERE it is saved (click to enlarge)

 

 

Comments powered by CComment